“Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, a move that would likely cause anxiety in the already troubled region.” (Reuters)

Bloodbaths in India with Americans targeted and heightened tensions with Pakistan Obama's No. 1 Target^®. Is this "change we need"?

on't try calling the Office of the President-Elect™. The political opportunists running it are too busy trying to put his cronies and most favored lobbyists in "our" public offices.

Terrorists followed 'al-Qaeda blueprint'

Terrorists behind co-ordinated attacks on a series of high-profile targets in India followed a "blueprint" created by al-Qaeda, one terrorism expert said today.

George Kassimeris, an expert in conflict and terrorism, said attacks on transport links, hotels and bars in Mumbai were "original" and "absolutely shocking".

He said the Islamic extremist group created the "modus operandi" of attacking vulnerable civilian targets with no warning, long-term plans or demands.

Witness accounts that gunmen were looking for US and British nationals suggest they want to grab international attention, he added....

The terrorists are believed to have entered Mumbai by sea, risk forecasters Exclusive Analysis said.

But the company's experts said they were "resistant" to reports that the attacks bore the hallmark of al-Qaeda or were even inspired by the jihadist movement founded by Osama bin Laden.

Indian intelligence has suggested the attackers may have been Pakistani, based on "loose evidence" that some of them spoke with a Pakistani accent, they said.

Given Former Senator Obama's obvious weakness and inexperience, no wonder we've just witnessed the highest number of innocent American civilians killed in a terrorist attack since September 11, 2001.

No doubt we'll see even more, now that the terrorists take his weakness and inexperience as an opportunity to target Americans and other Westerners in these types of attacks. That is, "to do things you think you could not do before."

But don't bother the former senator with it. He's got more important matters he wants to also sweep under the rug:

With Hillary [al-Qlinton]'s expected appointment tomorrow comes a round of buzz about "emoluments" and specifically the question of whether, under a fairly straightforward reading of the Constitution, her appointment isn't constitutional.

At issue is Article I, Section 6, which says, "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased [sic] during such time." That is, if the Cabinet, or other, post got a pay hike during the term of the senator, the senator couldn't take the job. During Clinton's Senate term, Bush raised the Cabinet's pay.

And there are serious lawyers who see this, legally speaking, as a real obstacle.

Since when have legal "concerns" been an obstacle to the former senator getting more power for himself and his special-interest cronies?

Another lying Baron von Münchhaussein Oliar lie:

Because if you are ready for change, then you can elect a president who has taught the Constitution, and believes in the Constitution, and will obey the Constitution of the United States of America.

Article of Impeachment I — in re: Unconstitutionally-Appointed Secretary of State al-Qlinton. (Or more aptly, just "Former Senator al-Qlinton.")

Lies, lies, and more lies.

Labels: aided and comforted enemies, anti-America liberals (BIRM), lying liberals (BIRM), Obama 'Nation', World War IV

	9:33 PM

Comments (registered users)