- And what sort of soldiers are those you are to lead? Are they reliable? Are they brave? Are they capable of victory? Their story is known to all of you. It is the story of the American man-at-arms. My estimate of him was formed on the battlefield many, many years ago, and has never changed. I regarded him then as I regard him now — as one of the world's noblest figures, not only as one of the finest military characters, but also as one of the most stainless. His name and fame are the birthright of every American citizen. In his youth and strength, his love and loyalty, he gave all that mortality can give.
He needs no eulogy from me or from any other man. He has written his own history and written it in red on his enemy's breast. But when I think of his patience under adversity, of his courage under fire, and of his modesty in victory, I am filled with an emotion of admiration I cannot put into words. He belongs to history as furnishing one of the greatest examples of successful patriotism. He belongs to posterity as the instructor of future generations in the principles of liberty and freedom. He belongs to the present, to us, by his virtues and by his achievements. In 20 campaigns, on a hundred battlefields, around a thousand campfires, I have witnessed that enduring fortitude, that patriotic self-abnegation, and that invincible determination which have carved his statue in the hearts of his people. From one end of the world to the other he has drained deep the chalice of courage.
As I listened to those songs, in memory's eye I could see those staggering columns of the First World War, bending under soggy packs, on many a weary march from dripping dusk to drizzling dawn, slogging ankle-deep through the mire of shell-shocked roads, to form grimly for the attack, blue-lipped, covered with sludge and mud, chilled by the wind and rain, driving home to their objective, and for many, to the judgment seat of God.
I do not know the dignity of their birth, but I do know the glory of their death.
They died unquestioning, uncomplaining, with faith in their hearts, and on their lips the hope that we would go on to victory.
Always, for them: Duty, Honor, Country; always their blood and sweat and tears, as we sought the way and the light and the truth.
May the Lord comfort and bless the loved ones of our freedoms' dear, departed defenders. May He make us truly thankful for our liberties, all of which we enjoy because of their sacrifices, and make us always keep them in our remembrance.
Of the twenty-three Senate Reliberals who got thirty pieces of Mexican silver for selling out our sovereignty, only five are facing reelection.N one of those five traitors to "their" country, except one, have to worry about being replaced by an actual Republican in any primary election before November: So after stringing up the career of Señor Chafee, that leaves us with the solemn task of getting these ten's political necks ready for the noose in 2008: | Incumbentraitor | State |
|---|
| Normando Coleman | Minnesota | | Susana "Sneezy" Collins | Maine | | Lorenzo Craig | Idaho | | Pedro Domenici | New Mexico | | Lindzoro "Dopey" Graham | South Carolina | | Carlos Hagel | Nebraska | | Miquel McConnell | Kentucky | | Gordonez Smith | Oregon | | Teodor Stevens | Alaska | | Juan "Grumpy" Warner | Virginia |
Their squirming for two years on political death row for giving aid and comfort to our nation's invaders and occupiers will hopefully deter a sufficient number of the remaining dozen from committing any further acts of treason.
A-P-Peeeeeeeez'd onN ow my fellow conservatives and I know exactly how ninety percent of all black American voters feel. Except it's the Republicans McDemocains in our Tedboat al-Qennedy's Senate who're taking us for granted, not the Delibberats. I propose an even better sellout compromise on the Amnesty1986® 2.0 issue. Instead of a Path to Citizenship™ for longstanding repeat offenders, how about a Twenty-Lane Highway to it? Or even a Non-Connecting International Flight? It would work something like this:
You're an illegal, unvaccinated invader undocumented soft fluffy bunnyworker who's been hard at work sponging off contributing to America's wealth. You need a Free Pass/Stay Off the Deportation Bus Feinstein-Fuschia Card so you can legally continue such contributing. However, having to go walk into an Immigration and Customs "Enforcement" office to get one would make you feel like a second-class citizen (no literalness intended). We can't have any of that because it would be too racist. So we'll just set up all along the border at 100-yard intervals a whole series of bubble gum machines with the fuschia cards placed right in them. Now don't think you can just get this free pass card for free. You'll have to pay The Fine™. In this case either a U.S. or Mexican quarter, which you'll have to insert into the machine in order to get your card. Also, to prevent fraud or falsifying of documents, you must keep this card inside your underwear (if any) at all times so there'll always be an ample biometric sample on it.
That takes care of the Home Invader Guest Worker feature of our Amnesty1986® 2.0 program. What about protecting the borders, you ask? Well, I've got a copout compromise for that too:
The word here is Enforcement, with a capital N. (You know, "n" like in "not" or "nifeintheback" or "nownewamnesty"— that is, "knowknewamnesty"— I mean "nonuamnesty"— er..."nonamnesty." Yeah, "nonamnesty." That's it.) Now, we could have 50,000 National Guard troops repelling the invaders asking to see your fuschia card, but they aren't trained for that. Besides, they're too busy doing the completely precedented job of actually stopping terrorists and potential threats dead in their tracks at the border of practically every other country except America. What makes anyone think they could do that same job here? Logic, people. Logic. No, we're going to do something that's really effective. We're going to contract the Mexican army to come across our border and enter California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, and stop anyone who isn't in the Mexican army from doing the same thing. We'll write in that contract a Strong™ anti-bribetaking clause, so neither you nor anyone else will be able to get around them by buying them off. So there.
This plan makes more sense than hiring a bunch of additional Border Patrol agents. First off, Mexican troops already speak the language of your fellow invaders and occupiers hardworking undocumented contributors to our society, so we won't have to give anyone Spanish lessons. Second, it'll be less costly for the U.S. taxpayer because we'll be able to get away with paying them much less than the minimum wage. Plus we won't have to bother with any of that Social Security, Medicare, and OSHA paperwork mess. Finally, there's the element-of-surprise factor. Any tuberculosis carrier undocumented contributor who enters the United Stated undocumentedly will see nothing but Mexican soldiers. They'll believe they're still in Mexico and will become disoriented and confused. As a result, they'll go back and tell their families that there is no United States up north and that they might as well all stay home. See? I mean, sí? Us American actual taxpayers will save a lot of money and paperwork. We'll no longer see any foreign international worker who hasn't arrived here legally. We'll really believe that's rain rolling down our backs.
Last and not most, I propose that we Crack Down Hard® on businesses that unlawfully hire anyone who isn't a citizen, a documented alien, or an amnestied remitter guest worker. They too will be required to pay The Fine™, depending on how many such persons they've hired. If one ever gets caught hiring 12,000 illegals decent, hardworking obeyers of Mexican laws only, that business will be fined a total of $3,000. You may not think that's a lot of money for a business that's making millions off exploiting people cheating the system paying inordinately reduced labor costs. But trust me. Not only is that shadow you see darkening the puddle really being cast by a rain cloud, but just think feel. A couple of thousand here, a couple of thousand there — that can quickly add up to some pretty hefty fines!
Now isn't this Amnesty1986® Second Edition program a better download than what the McDemocain controlled Senate released? Provided, of course, you don't live in Vermont where the snow only sometimes turns yellow.
Isn't it a great feeling being appeased like this?
 
There is no Sanctuary Clause in our nation's constitution.“F elony” appears exactly twice, both times capitalized, in our consitution. Its second appearance is in Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 ("Rendition Clause"). Its first is in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, which says - The Senators and Representatives.... shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same....
Felony usually means any federal, state, or local offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. The United States Code sections dealing with bribery, graft, and conflicts of interest (Title 18, Part I, Chapter 11), make willful commissions of bribery such a felony.
For example, when a Culturally Corrupt Demobriberat Congressman admits on videotape to willfully "keep[ing] secret what the government contends was his corrupt role in getting his children a cut of [his] communications company's deal for work in Africa" — a deal he willfully planned to secure with his $100,000 bribe of a high-ranking, foreign government official (e.g., Nigeria's vice president) — a deal undoubtedly requiring coordination with or assistance of federal agencies that administer the African Growth Opportunity Act — it's a felony:
- Section 203. Compensation to Members of Congress, officers, and others in matters affecting the Government
(a) Whoever, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duties, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept any compensation for any representational services, as agent or attorney or otherwise, rendered or to be rendered either personally or by another at a time when such person is a Member of Congress [or] Member of Congress Elect... in relation to any proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim,... or other particular matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest, before any department [or] agency... or knowingly gives, promises, or offers any compensation for any such representational services rendered or to be rendered at a time when the person to whom the compensation is given, promised, or offered, is or was such a Member [or] Member Elect... shall be subject to the penalties set forth in section 216 of this title.
Section 216. Penalties and injunctions
(a) The punishment for an offense under section 203, 204, 205, 207, 208, or 209 of this title is the following: (1) Whoever engages in the conduct constituting the offense shall be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both. (2) Whoever willfully engages in the conduct constituting the offense shall be imprisoned for not more than five years or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both.
There is no privilege from arrest, indictment, subpoena, investigation, or other prosecutorial process for any person in our country, including Demobriberat Congressmen, when appropriate authorities have sworn under oath there is probable cause to arrest, indict, subpoena, investigate, or otherwise prosecute such person. As FindLaw.com notes,
- Privilege From Arrest clause is practically obsolete. It applies only to arrests in civil suits, which were still common in this country at the time the Constitution was adopted. It does not apply to service of process in either civil or criminal cases. Nor does it apply to arrest in any criminal case. The phrase "treason, felony or breach of the peace" is interpreted to withdraw all criminal offenses from the operation of the privilege.
San Fran Nan, with her Team Malfeasors, PAC to the Federal Law Violators, and Center for Taxpayer Bilking by the Common Crook, instead of babbling about checks and balances which amount to sanctuary for a criminal suspect or trying to offer him a mere slap on the wrist, would do well to read up on these provisions and statutes.
don't you think?I t's like deportation from your illegal stay. It's no free speech for others when you hate what they said.... Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Teen accused of sign theft may be deported
THE ASS-O-LATTE-DRINKING PRESS
SOUTHAMPTON, N.Y. — A Honduran teenager faces deportation after being charged with stealing an anti-immigration protest sign.
Joel Martines, 19, was arrested May 11 on charges he stole the sign outside a convenience store where day laborers [Unvaccinated Invaders®] seek [less than minimum wage] work. The store has been the scene of protests supporting stricter [READ: any meaningful] enforcement of immigration laws.
While Martines was in custody, immigration authorities determined he entered the country illegally last year through Texas. [The fact they actually decided to determine this at all ought to have been the story. –LR] It's very good riddance for this Hard-Working Contributor To Our Society™. Oh, and... it figures.
Achieving total deportation by declaring open season on illegal invaders.A ccording to the National Association of Bail Enforcement Agents, bounty hunters successfully capture nearly 90 percent of all bail jumpers. These jumpers are people who usually avoid venturing out to find or show up at a job because that would increase their chance of being captured. Illegal, unvaccinated workers are, by definition, always venturing out to Take Jobs No American Will Take™, so the ability of bounty hunters to find and capture a border jumper is even greater. By any measure it would far exceed the U.S. Border Patrol's 10 to 25 percent capture rate. At, say, $5000 a head, the prospect of hauling in an illegal Mexican Reconquistador® or an other-than-Mexican absconder who's failed to appear for his immigration hearing, would be a profitable one for any bounty hunter. Theoretically, if all 12 million current invaders were hauled in, total payments to bounty hunters would equal $60 billion. In reality, once these captures commence many of the invaders likely will start hightailing it back across the border rather than try to continue occupying a county where they have a very real price on their heads. We may even see the flow rates of U.S. to Mexico crossings surpass and eventually render negligible any remaining ones in the opposite direction.
In contrast to the illegal occupiers' "remittances" of dollars to Mexico and other countries, the money that bounty hunters earn and spend would actually help the economy and increase tax revenues for states most afflicted by the invasion crisis. Finally, any registration or licensing requirements for illegal-immigrant bounty hunting could be the same ones prescribed by the several states for bail enforcement actions. In other words, every bail enforcement agent in our country is automatically qualified to be an illegal-immigrant bounty hunter.
So let the captures begin. It will stimulate private enterprise, reduce and even reverse the flow of invaders, increase sales and income tax revenues, and all but totally remove every illegal occupier of our country.
If you know a business that's hiring illegal immigrants invaders and occupiers, give Immigration and Customs Enforcement a call. You could be eligible for a $1000 reward and you don't have to give your name.G uest. A person who sneaks or breaks into your home, helps himself to whatever's in it, refuses to leave after you ask him to, demands that you give him room and board, a job, health services, etc., and screams bloody murder about how you're violating his "rights" when you call the police asking them to protect you, your family and your property. That's the liberalized definition, which supporters of unguarded borders and unlawful hirings are trying to shove down all our throats. Not only that, if this "guest" washes your dishes or folds your sheets after he steals your food and sleeps in your bed, you're supposed to say, "My, you certainly contribute to our household. Thank you."
Thanks to this new concept, the word is now synonymous with trespasser, thief, intruder, and home invader. Add to the list unvaccinated disease carrier as well as possible terrorist, and you have a complete description of another concept. Threat. As in to your health, peace, and security.
Unfortunately, until we actually punish the employers who are breaking our laws whenever they wittingly hire such "guests," thus creating a demand for them, no number of our brave National Guard members patrolling America's borders will be sufficient to cut off — or make too costly — the current cheap supply of these illegal invaders and occupiers.
|
